|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
Data corrente: |
17/02/2017 |
Data da última atualização: |
30/01/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
BESSA, M. E. De; RODARTE, M. P.; OTENIO, M. H.; STRINGHETA, P. C.; OLIVEIRA, J. M. De; BARBOSA, J. C.; PINTO, M. A. De O. |
Afiliação: |
Martha Eunice de Bessa, CES/JF; Miriam Pereira Rodarte, UFJF; MARCELO HENRIQUE OTENIO, CNPGL; Paulo Cesar Stringheta, UFV/VIÇOSA; Juliana Mauricio de Oliveira, UFJF; Jucélia Silva Barbosa, UFJF; Miriam Aparecida de Oliveira Pinto, UFJF. |
Título: |
Sensory perception of the fermented goat milk: potential application of the DSC method. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Food Science and Technology, v. 36, n. 3, p. 406-412, 2016. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Goat milk and its derivatives present proven beneficial health properties; however, some sensory aspects associated to consumers? expectations restrict the consumption growth for these products. In this work, fermented caprine milk formulations have been evaluated utilizing the methodology of Discourse of the Collective Subject (Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo ? DSC) associated to sensory analysis, in order to evaluate the perception of fermented caprine milk by consumers. The physicochemical and microbiological requisites of the fermented milk formulations evaluated during the storage, were according to current legislation. The probiotic characteristics of evaluated formulations were preserved, presenting viable cells counts for Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5, Bifidobacterium BB-12, and Streptococcus thermophilus higher than 1x106 CFU/mL, along 28 days of storage. The Discourse of the Collective Subject results have shown that the typical taste and flavor, present in products derived from caprine milk, did not influence the purchase intention, which was expressive for all fermented milks. The Discourse of the Collective Subject has elucidated the consumers? perspective, determining then both, the consumers? profile and the factors interfering on the acquisition of fermented caprine milk. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Caprine milk; Consumer; Discourse of the Collective Subject. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/156031/1/Cnpgl-2016-FoodSciTech-Sensory.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02003naa a2200229 a 4500 001 2064648 005 2023-01-30 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aBESSA, M. E. De 245 $aSensory perception of the fermented goat milk$bpotential application of the DSC method.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2016 520 $aGoat milk and its derivatives present proven beneficial health properties; however, some sensory aspects associated to consumers? expectations restrict the consumption growth for these products. In this work, fermented caprine milk formulations have been evaluated utilizing the methodology of Discourse of the Collective Subject (Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo ? DSC) associated to sensory analysis, in order to evaluate the perception of fermented caprine milk by consumers. The physicochemical and microbiological requisites of the fermented milk formulations evaluated during the storage, were according to current legislation. The probiotic characteristics of evaluated formulations were preserved, presenting viable cells counts for Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5, Bifidobacterium BB-12, and Streptococcus thermophilus higher than 1x106 CFU/mL, along 28 days of storage. The Discourse of the Collective Subject results have shown that the typical taste and flavor, present in products derived from caprine milk, did not influence the purchase intention, which was expressive for all fermented milks. The Discourse of the Collective Subject has elucidated the consumers? perspective, determining then both, the consumers? profile and the factors interfering on the acquisition of fermented caprine milk. 653 $aCaprine milk 653 $aConsumer 653 $aDiscourse of the Collective Subject 700 1 $aRODARTE, M. P. 700 1 $aOTENIO, M. H. 700 1 $aSTRINGHETA, P. C. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, J. M. De 700 1 $aBARBOSA, J. C. 700 1 $aPINTO, M. A. De O. 773 $tFood Science and Technology$gv. 36, n. 3, p. 406-412, 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Solos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnps.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
Data corrente: |
23/08/2016 |
Data da última atualização: |
09/11/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
Autoria: |
CLEMENT, C. R.; DENEVAN, W. M.; HECKENBERGER, M. J.; JUNQUEIRA, A. B.; NEVES, E. G.; TEIXEIRA, W. G.; WOODS, W. I. |
Afiliação: |
CHARLES R. CLEMENT, INPA; WILLIAM M. DENEVAN, UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN; MICHAEL J. HECKENBERGER, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA; ANDRÉ BRAGA JUNQUEIRA, INPA; EDUARDO G. NEVES, USP; WENCESLAU GERALDES TEIXEIRA, CNPS; WILLIAM I. WOODS, UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS. |
Título: |
Response to comment by McMichael, Piperno and Bush. |
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: biological sciences, v. 282, n. 1821, 20152459, Dez. 2015. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2459 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
We thank McMichael et al. for commenting on our recent review [1]. They focus on: our misinterpretation of their published data; use of data that is not pre-Conquest; and the extrapolative nature of our review. As they point out, we agree with them about heterogeneous landscape domestication across Amazonia, but we dis- agree with their conclusions about the extent to which forests were altered in western Amazonia and elsewhere [2,3]. As western Amazonia covers approxi- mately 2 000 000 km2, they are making a major statement. We consider their claim to be of an excessively 'extrapolative nature' given their data. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Fitólito. |
Thesagro: |
Carvão Vegetal. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
Marc: |
LEADER 01346naa a2200241 a 4500 001 2051519 005 2021-11-09 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2459$2DOI 100 1 $aCLEMENT, C. R. 245 $aResponse to comment by McMichael, Piperno and Bush.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2015 520 $aWe thank McMichael et al. for commenting on our recent review [1]. They focus on: our misinterpretation of their published data; use of data that is not pre-Conquest; and the extrapolative nature of our review. As they point out, we agree with them about heterogeneous landscape domestication across Amazonia, but we dis- agree with their conclusions about the extent to which forests were altered in western Amazonia and elsewhere [2,3]. As western Amazonia covers approxi- mately 2 000 000 km2, they are making a major statement. We consider their claim to be of an excessively 'extrapolative nature' given their data. 650 $aAmazonia 650 $aCarvão Vegetal 653 $aFitólito 700 1 $aDENEVAN, W. M. 700 1 $aHECKENBERGER, M. J. 700 1 $aJUNQUEIRA, A. B. 700 1 $aNEVES, E. G. 700 1 $aTEIXEIRA, W. G. 700 1 $aWOODS, W. I. 773 $tProceedings of the Royal Society B: biological sciences$gv. 282, n. 1821, 20152459, Dez. 2015.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|